Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis: The Caterpillar Sign on Abdominal X-Ray

Edited by ScholarGen MediAI Team

Recognizing Gastric Hyperperistalsis, Understanding Ultrasound Diagnostic Criteria, and Identifying Early Gastric Outlet Obstruction in Infants

Introduction: When an Infant's Vomiting Reveals a Mechanical Obstruction

Progressively worsening vomiting in a young infant should never be dismissed as simple gastroesophageal reflux without considering an underlying structural abnormality.

One important diagnosis is infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS), a condition characterized by progressive thickening of the pyloric muscle, narrowing of the gastric outlet, and impaired passage of gastric contents into the duodenum.

The clinical presentation can be deceptively straightforward: an otherwise healthy infant develops increasingly frequent, forceful, nonbilious vomiting after feeding. However, as the obstruction progresses, the infant may develop dehydration, inadequate weight gain, and potentially significant electrolyte and acid-base disturbances.

Imaging plays a central role in recognizing this condition. Although abdominal ultrasonography is the preferred diagnostic examination, conventional abdominal radiography can provide an important initial clue.

One particularly recognizable radiographic finding is the caterpillar sign, which reflects vigorous gastric peristalsis against an obstructed pyloric outlet.

This article examines a 23-day-old male infant who presented with progressively worsening nonbilious vomiting, a palpable olive-shaped abdominal mass, and characteristic imaging findings. The case illustrates how clinical examination, abdominal radiography, and targeted ultrasonography can work together to establish the diagnosis of IHPS.

Clinical Case: A 23-Day-Old Infant With Progressive Nonbilious Vomiting

A 23-day-old male infant was brought to the emergency department because of increasingly frequent vomiting over five days.

The vomiting was nonbilious, suggesting that the obstruction was located proximal to the entry of bile into the gastrointestinal tract.

Physical examination revealed mild dehydration. An approximately 2-cm olive-shaped mass was also palpable in the abdomen, providing an important clinical clue.

An initial abdominal radiograph demonstrated a distended, gas-filled stomach with an undulating contour produced by prominent gastric peristaltic activity.

The characteristic appearance raised suspicion for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

Because ultrasonography was not readily available during the initial evaluation, radiography provided an important preliminary diagnostic indication. Subsequent abdominal ultrasonography confirmed substantial pyloric muscle thickening and elongation.

The reported sonographic measurements were:

Pyloric muscle wall thickness: 4.5 mm
Pyloric diameter: 25.0 mm
Pyloric canal length: 24.0 mm

The infant subsequently underwent open pyloromyotomy without reported surgical complications.

He was discharged home two days after surgery, tolerating full feeds. At the three-month follow-up, he was reported to be growing well.

This clinical course demonstrates the importance of recognizing early imaging findings before progressive gastric outlet obstruction leads to more significant physiological complications.

1. Pathophysiology: Why Does the Pylorus Become Thickened?

The pylorus is the muscular outlet connecting the stomach to the proximal duodenum. Its primary function is to regulate the passage of gastric contents into the small intestine.

In infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, abnormal hypertrophy and hyperplasia of the pyloric muscular layers progressively narrow and elongate the pyloric canal.

The circular muscle layer is particularly affected.

As the muscle becomes thicker, the pyloric lumen becomes increasingly restricted. Gastric emptying is consequently impaired, resulting in functional gastric outlet obstruction.

The stomach continues to produce gastric secretions and receives ingested milk, but the contents cannot pass normally through the narrowed pyloric channel.

This creates several physiological consequences:

Progressive gastric distention.
Increased gastric peristaltic activity.
Forceful, nonbilious vomiting.
Progressive loss of fluid and gastric electrolytes.
Dehydration and metabolic disturbances.

The stomach attempts to overcome the mechanical obstruction through increasingly vigorous contractions.

These contractions explain why prominent peristaltic waves may become visible on the abdominal examination and produce the characteristic undulating gastric contour on plain radiographs.

Why Is the Vomiting Nonbilious?

The anatomical location of the obstruction explains an important clinical feature.

Bile enters the gastrointestinal tract through the major duodenal papilla, which is located distal to the pylorus.

Therefore, when the pyloric canal is obstructed, gastric contents are expelled before they can mix with bile.

The result is typically nonbilious vomiting.

This distinction is clinically important because bilious vomiting in a neonate or young infant requires urgent evaluation for potentially serious intestinal obstruction, including malrotation with midgut volvulus.

2. Epidemiology: Who Develops Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis?

Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis is an important cause of gastric outlet obstruction during early infancy.

It most commonly presents during the first several weeks after birth, frequently between approximately three and six weeks of age.

Although it can occur in both sexes, the condition is more common in male infants.

A male predominance is consistently reported in clinical and radiological literature.

The exact cause remains incompletely understood. Both genetic susceptibility and environmental influences have been implicated.

Recognized associations include:

Male sex.
Family history of pyloric stenosis.
Certain perinatal and early-life exposures.
Early macrolide antibiotic exposure, particularly erythromycin.
First-born status, reported in several epidemiological studies.

These factors should be interpreted as associations rather than diagnostic criteria.

The diagnosis ultimately depends on the clinical presentation and demonstration of characteristic pyloric abnormalities on imaging.

An important point in this case is the infant's age of only 23 days. Although this is relatively early, it is compatible with the clinical spectrum of IHPS.

3. Clinical Presentation: Recognizing the Warning Signs

The classical presentation is progressively worsening, forceful, nonbilious vomiting after feeding.

The symptoms may initially be intermittent and relatively mild. As pyloric obstruction becomes more pronounced, vomiting generally increases in frequency and severity.

Characteristic Clinical Findings

A. Progressive projectile vomiting

The most recognizable symptom is forceful vomiting following feeding.

Unlike uncomplicated regurgitation, projectile vomiting reflects substantial gastric contractions against an increasingly restricted gastric outlet.

B. Persistent hunger after vomiting

Some infants remain hungry immediately after vomiting because they have emptied much of their gastric contents but remain unable to maintain normal feeding.

C. Dehydration

Repeated vomiting produces progressive fluid loss.

Clinical findings may include:

Reduced urine output.
Dry mucous membranes.
Poor skin turgor.
Weight loss or inadequate weight gain.
Lethargy in more advanced cases.

D. Palpable olive-shaped mass

A small, firm, mobile mass may be palpated in the upper abdomen, typically in the right upper quadrant or epigastric region.

This represents the hypertrophied pylorus.

Although the palpable olive is a classic finding, its absence does not exclude IHPS.

E. Visible gastric peristalsis

In some infants, waves of gastric contraction can be observed moving across the upper abdomen.

These waves reflect the stomach's effort to overcome the mechanical obstruction.

Laboratory Findings

Repeated vomiting can produce characteristic biochemical abnormalities.

The classic laboratory pattern includes:

Hypochloremia.
Hypokalemia.
Metabolic alkalosis.

These changes result from gastric hydrochloric acid loss and progressive volume depletion.

However, infants presenting early may have normal or only mildly abnormal laboratory values.

A normal electrolyte profile therefore does not exclude the diagnosis.

4. Imaging Features: The Diagnostic Importance of the Caterpillar Sign

Imaging is essential for confirming suspected IHPS and distinguishing it from other causes of vomiting in infancy.

Two imaging modalities are particularly relevant:

Abdominal radiography.
Abdominal ultrasonography.

Their diagnostic roles are different.

Radiography may reveal secondary evidence of gastric outlet obstruction, whereas ultrasonography directly demonstrates the abnormal pyloric muscle and canal.

4.1 Abdominal Radiography: The Caterpillar Sign

The caterpillar sign is a characteristic radiographic appearance associated with vigorous gastric peristalsis in the presence of pyloric obstruction.

On an abdominal radiograph, the stomach appears markedly distended and gas-filled.

Its contour may become undulating because prominent peristaltic contractions create a series of alternating impressions along the gastric wall.

This appearance resembles the segmented body of a caterpillar.

The underlying mechanism is straightforward:

The stomach receives swallowed milk and secretions.
The pyloric outlet is progressively narrowed.
Gastric contents cannot pass normally into the duodenum.
The stomach responds with vigorous peristaltic contractions.
These contractions produce the characteristic undulating contour.

The radiographic appearance is therefore a manifestation of gastric hyperperistalsis against mechanical resistance.

Figure 1. Simple Abdominal Radiograph (AP View)

Radiologic interpretation: An anteroposterior abdominal radiograph demonstrates a distended, gas-filled stomach. The gastric configuration and prominent peristaltic activity should raise suspicion for gastric outlet obstruction.

Diagnostic significance: In a young infant with progressive nonbilious vomiting, this appearance should prompt consideration of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

4.2 Understanding the Caterpillar Sign

The caterpillar sign is not simply a consequence of gastric distention.

Its diagnostic value comes from the combination of gastric enlargement and an undulating contour produced by active peristaltic contractions.

This distinction is important.

A distended stomach alone is nonspecific and may occur in several conditions. However, a distended stomach with conspicuous peristaltic waves in an infant with progressive nonbilious vomiting provides a more specific clinical-radiological clue.

The sign is supportive rather than definitive.

Its absence does not exclude IHPS, and its presence should lead to targeted ultrasonography whenever available.

Figure 2. Abdominal Radiograph Demonstrating the Caterpillar Sign

Radiologic interpretation: The red arrow identifies the undulating gastric contour associated with prominent peristaltic activity.

Diagnostic significance: The caterpillar-like configuration represents gastric hyperperistalsis against a narrowed pyloric outlet. In the appropriate clinical setting, this finding strongly supports suspicion of IHPS.

4.3 Ultrasonography: The Preferred Diagnostic Examination

Abdominal ultrasonography is the preferred imaging examination for suspected infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

It provides direct visualization of the pyloric muscle without exposing the infant to ionizing radiation.

A high-frequency linear transducer is generally used to evaluate the antropyloric region.

The examination should assess:

Pyloric muscle thickness.
Pyloric canal length.
Overall pyloric morphology.
Passage of gastric contents through the pyloric channel.
Dynamic relaxation or persistent narrowing.

The two most important quantitative measurements are pyloric muscle thickness and pyloric canal length.

Commonly used diagnostic thresholds include:

Muscle thickness of approximately 3 mm or greater.
Pyloric canal length of approximately 15–18 mm or greater.

These measurements should not be interpreted in isolation. Patient size, age, examination technique, and the appearance of the pylorus during dynamic assessment can influence interpretation.

4.4 The Sonographic Appearance of IHPS

On longitudinal ultrasonography, the hypertrophied pyloric muscle appears as a thickened, hypoechoic muscular structure surrounding the central echogenic mucosal channel.

The elongated pyloric canal produces a characteristic appearance.

On transverse imaging, the thickened muscular wall surrounds the central mucosal lumen, creating the familiar target or doughnut appearance.

Other recognized sonographic signs include:

Cervix sign

The elongated, thickened pyloric muscle produces an appearance resembling the uterine cervix on longitudinal imaging.

Doughnut sign

The circular arrangement of the hypertrophied muscle surrounding the central mucosa creates a target-like appearance on transverse imaging.

Antral nipple sign

Hypertrophied pyloric mucosa may protrude into the gastric antrum, producing a nipple-like appearance.

Train-track appearance

The elongated pyloric channel and its central mucosal lining may produce parallel echogenic lines on longitudinal images.

These signs describe different aspects of the same anatomical abnormality. They should not be confused with the caterpillar sign, which is primarily a plain-radiographic description of gastric peristaltic activity.

Figure 3. Ultrasonography Demonstrating Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis

Radiologic interpretation: Longitudinal ultrasonography demonstrates an elongated, thickened pyloric region with a prominent muscular wall and central mucosal channel.

The white arrow identifies the pyloric muscle thickness, annotated as approximately 5 mm in the image.

The red arrow identifies the pyloric canal length, annotated as approximately 20 mm.

The stomach is labeled S.

Diagnostic significance: These findings demonstrate structural hypertrophy of the pyloric muscle and elongation of the pyloric canal, supporting the diagnosis of IHPS.

4.5 Quantitative Ultrasound Assessment in This Case

The reported ultrasound measurements were:

Parameter	Case Measurement	Common Diagnostic Reference
Pyloric muscle thickness	4.5 mm	≥3 mm
Pyloric canal length	24.0 mm	Approximately ≥15–18 mm
Pyloric diameter	25.0 mm	Interpret with morphology and other measurements

The pyloric muscle thickness of 4.5 mm exceeds the commonly used 3-mm threshold.

The reported canal length of 24 mm also substantially exceeds commonly used diagnostic reference values.

Together with the clinical presentation and palpable olive-shaped mass, these measurements provide strong evidence of IHPS.

Measurement note: The ultrasound illustration separately annotates a muscle thickness of approximately 5 mm and a canal length of approximately 20 mm. These image annotations differ from the numerical measurements reported in the clinical narrative. Both sets of values are retained as presented, rather than treating them as identical measurements.

5. Differential Diagnosis: What Else Can Cause Vomiting in an Infant?

Although IHPS is a major consideration in an infant with progressive nonbilious vomiting, several other conditions must be considered.

The character of the vomitus, age at presentation, abdominal examination, and imaging findings help narrow the differential diagnosis.

Condition	Characteristic Clinical or Imaging Findings	Distinguishing Point
Gastroesophageal reflux	Regurgitation after feeding	Usually lacks progressive mechanical obstruction
Duodenal atresia	Bilious vomiting; double-bubble sign	Congenital proximal intestinal obstruction
Intestinal malrotation	May present with bilious vomiting	Abnormal duodenojejunal junction on upper GI series
Midgut volvulus	Acute bilious vomiting and possible abdominal compromise	Corkscrew appearance or sonographic whirlpool sign
Gastric duplication cyst	Cystic abdominal mass	Demonstrable cystic structure on ultrasound
Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis	Progressive nonbilious projectile vomiting; thickened pylorus	Caterpillar sign may be seen on radiography; ultrasound confirms the diagnosis

An Important Clinical Distinction: Bilious Versus Nonbilious Vomiting

The distinction between bilious and nonbilious vomiting is particularly important in neonatal and infantile gastrointestinal emergencies.

Nonbilious vomiting is compatible with obstruction proximal to the entry of bile into the duodenum, as occurs in IHPS.

Bilious vomiting raises concern for obstruction distal to the ampulla of Vater.

Malrotation with midgut volvulus is an especially important diagnosis to exclude because delayed treatment can result in intestinal ischemia and necrosis.

Therefore, an infant with bilious vomiting requires urgent assessment rather than routine evaluation for uncomplicated pyloric stenosis.

6. Treatment: Why Pyloromyotomy Is the Standard Approach

The definitive treatment for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis is surgical correction.

However, immediate surgery is not the first step in an infant with significant dehydration or electrolyte abnormalities.

The initial priority is physiological stabilization.

6.1 Preoperative Stabilization

Repeated vomiting can produce substantial fluid and electrolyte losses.

Before surgery, clinicians should assess:

Hydration status.
Serum sodium.
Serum potassium.
Serum chloride.
Bicarbonate concentration.
Renal function.
Acid-base status.

Intravenous fluid replacement is used to correct dehydration and restore circulating volume.

Electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities should also be corrected before anesthesia.

This is an essential principle of IHPS management: pyloric stenosis is a surgical condition, but the operation should generally follow appropriate medical stabilization.

6.2 Pyloromyotomy

The standard surgical procedure is pyloromyotomy, traditionally described as the Ramstedt procedure.

During the operation, the surgeon makes a longitudinal incision through the hypertrophied pyloric muscle while preserving the underlying mucosa.

The muscle fibers are separated, allowing the previously narrowed pyloric channel to open and gastric contents to pass into the duodenum.

Two commonly used surgical approaches are:

Open pyloromyotomy.
Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.

Both approaches are established treatments, and the choice depends on surgical expertise, institutional practice, and patient-specific considerations.

6.3 Postoperative Recovery

Following successful pyloromyotomy, gastric emptying generally improves.

Feeding is gradually resumed according to the treating institution's postoperative protocol.

Some infants may experience vomiting during the early postoperative period. This does not necessarily indicate surgical failure.

Persistent or worsening vomiting, however, requires reassessment to exclude complications such as incomplete myotomy, mucosal injury, or another underlying gastrointestinal condition.

In this case, the infant underwent open pyloromyotomy without reported complications.

He was discharged two days later while tolerating full feeds.

7. Prognosis: Excellent Outcomes With Timely Diagnosis

The prognosis of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis is generally excellent when the diagnosis is established promptly, and appropriate treatment is performed.

Most infants recover well after pyloromyotomy.

The primary determinants of safe management are early recognition, correction of dehydration and electrolyte abnormalities, and successful surgical relief of the obstruction.

Potential complications of untreated IHPS include:

Severe dehydration.
Hypochloremia.
Hypokalemia.
Metabolic alkalosis.
Inadequate nutrition and weight gain.
Progressive physiological instability.

Postoperative complications are uncommon but may include incomplete myotomy, mucosal perforation, wound infection, and persistent vomiting.

The clinical outcome in this case was favorable.

The infant was discharged two days after surgery and was reported to be growing well at the three-month follow-up.

This reinforces the importance of integrating clinical findings with imaging rather than waiting for advanced dehydration or severe biochemical abnormalities to develop.

8. Clinical and Radiological Takeaways

The case highlights several practical lessons for clinicians, radiologists, pediatricians, and emergency physicians.

First, progressive nonbilious vomiting in a young infant requires careful evaluation.

Repeated vomiting should not automatically be attributed to reflux, particularly when symptoms are increasing in frequency or severity.

Second, a palpable olive-shaped mass is an important clinical clue.

Although it is not always detectable, its presence substantially increases suspicion for IHPS.

Third, the caterpillar sign provides a useful radiographic clue.

A markedly distended stomach with prominent undulating contours reflects vigorous peristalsis against a narrowed pyloric outlet.

Fourth, ultrasonography is the preferred diagnostic modality.

Direct assessment of pyloric muscle thickness, canal length, morphology, and dynamic opening provides more definitive evidence than plain radiography.

Fifth, imaging findings must be interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical condition.

The diagnosis should not depend on a single numerical threshold without considering the overall sonographic appearance and clinical history.

Finally, correction of dehydration and electrolyte abnormalities must precede definitive surgical treatment when necessary.

Early recognition and appropriate stabilization are central to achieving excellent outcomes.

Test Your Clinical and Radiological Knowledge

Question 1. Recognizing the Caterpillar Sign

A 23-day-old male infant presents with progressively worsening nonbilious vomiting. An abdominal radiograph demonstrates a markedly distended, gas-filled stomach with an undulating contour along the gastric wall.

Which of the following best explains this radiographic appearance?

A. Abnormal rotation of the midgut
B. Gastric hyperperistalsis against an obstructed pylorus
C. Congenital absence of the duodenal lumen
D. Paralysis of the gastric muscular wall
E. Intrinsic gastric duplication

Correct Answer: B. Gastric hyperperistalsis against an obstructed pylorus

Explanation:

The caterpillar sign reflects vigorous gastric peristaltic contractions against a narrowed pyloric outlet. The resulting undulating gastric contour resembles the segmented body of a caterpillar.

It is a supportive radiographic finding in IHPS, but ultrasonography is required for definitive assessment.

Question 2. Selecting the Most Appropriate Imaging Examination

A 4-week-old infant presents with projectile nonbilious vomiting and a palpable olive-shaped mass in the upper abdomen. IHPS is strongly suspected.

Which imaging examination is most appropriate to confirm the diagnosis?

A. Abdominal CT
B. Upper gastrointestinal barium examination as the first-line study
C. Abdominal ultrasonography
D. Abdominal MRI
E. Repeat abdominal radiography after feeding

Correct Answer: C. Abdominal ultrasonography

Explanation:

Ultrasonography is the preferred diagnostic examination for IHPS. It directly demonstrates pyloric muscle hypertrophy, canal elongation, and impaired passage through the pylorus.

It also avoids ionizing radiation, an important consideration in young infants.

Question 3. Interpreting Ultrasound Measurements

A 3-week-old infant undergoes abdominal ultrasonography because of persistent nonbilious vomiting. The pyloric muscle thickness measures 4.5 mm, and the pyloric canal length measures 24 mm.

Which interpretation is most appropriate?

A. Normal pyloric morphology
B. Findings strongly support infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis
C. Findings indicate duodenal atresia
D. Findings are diagnostic of gastric duplication
E. Findings indicate intestinal malrotation

Correct Answer: B. Findings strongly support infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis

Explanation:

A pyloric muscle thickness of 4.5 mm exceeds the commonly used diagnostic reference of approximately 3 mm. A canal length of 24 mm is also substantially increased.

When these measurements are accompanied by characteristic pyloric morphology and the appropriate clinical presentation, they strongly support IHPS.

Question 4. Understanding the Biochemical Abnormalities

A 5-week-old infant with untreated IHPS presents with repeated vomiting and moderate dehydration.

Which laboratory pattern is classically associated with this condition?

A. Hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis
B. Hypochloremic, hypokalemic metabolic alkalosis
C. Hyperkalemic metabolic alkalosis
D. Hypernatremic metabolic acidosis
E. Isolated respiratory alkalosis

Correct Answer: B. Hypochloremic, hypokalemic metabolic alkalosis

Explanation:

Repeated loss of gastric hydrochloric acid produces hypochloremia and metabolic alkalosis. Progressive volume depletion and renal compensatory mechanisms may contribute to potassium loss and hypokalemia.

These abnormalities are important to identify and correct before anesthesia and surgery.

Question 5. Determining the Appropriate Treatment Sequence

A 4-week-old infant is diagnosed with IHPS by ultrasonography. Laboratory tests reveal significant dehydration, hypochloremia, and metabolic alkalosis.

What is the most appropriate management approach?

A. Immediate pyloromyotomy without fluid replacement
B. Long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy
C. Intravenous fluid and electrolyte correction followed by pyloromyotomy
D. Repeated upper gastrointestinal contrast examinations
E. Observation without further intervention

Correct Answer: C. Intravenous fluid and electrolyte correction followed by pyloromyotomy

Explanation:

Pyloromyotomy is the definitive treatment for IHPS. However, dehydration and electrolyte abnormalities must first be corrected to reduce perioperative risk.

Once the infant is physiologically stabilized, surgical correction can be performed.

Key Learning Point: Successful management of IHPS requires both accurate imaging diagnosis and appropriate preoperative physiological stabilization.

Conclusion

Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis is an important and treatable cause of progressive nonbilious vomiting during early infancy.

The caterpillar sign is a valuable radiographic clue that reflects gastric hyperperistalsis against an obstructed pyloric outlet. Although it is not sufficiently reliable to establish the diagnosis independently, it can direct clinicians toward the appropriate next examination.

Abdominal ultrasonography remains the preferred diagnostic study because it directly demonstrates pyloric muscle hypertrophy and canal elongation.

In the presented 23-day-old infant, the combination of progressive vomiting, mild dehydration, a palpable olive-shaped mass, characteristic gastric distention, and abnormal pyloric measurements established the diagnosis.

Successful open pyloromyotomy resulted in an uncomplicated recovery and favorable follow-up.

The central clinical message is simple: Recognizing the caterpillar sign may raise suspicion, but demonstrating pyloric muscle hypertrophy on ultrasound confirms the diagnosis and guides definitive treatment.

Internal link:

- Pediatric abdominal radiography.

- Neonatal gastrointestinal obstruction.

- Ultrasound diagnosis of gastrointestinal diseases.

- Imaging signs in pediatric emergencies.

Medical Disclaimer

This article is intended for medical education and professional information. It does not replace individualized clinical assessment, interpretation of diagnostic imaging, or specialist consultation. Suspected gastrointestinal obstruction in an infant requires prompt medical evaluation.

References

[1] B. S. Rich and S. E. Dolgin, "Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis," Pediatrics in Review, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 539–545, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2020-003277

[2] M. Jobson and N. J. Hall, "Contemporary management of pyloric stenosis," Seminars in Pediatric Surgery, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 219–224, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2016.05.004

[3] T. I. Ball, G. O. Atkinson Jr., and B. B. Gay Jr., "Ultrasound diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: Real-time application and the demonstration of a new sonographic sign," Radiology, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 499–502, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.147.2.6836129

[4] N. Forster, R. L. Haddad, S. Choroomi, A. V. Dilley, and J. Pereira, "Use of ultrasound in 187 infants with suspected infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis," Australasian Radiology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 560–563, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1673.2007.01872.x

[5] G. Choi, B.-K. Je, and Y. J. Kim, "Gastrointestinal Emergency in Neonates and Infants: A Pictorial Essay," Korean Journal of Radiology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 124–138, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0111

[6] "Diagnostic accuracy of palpation and ultrasonography for diagnosing infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis," British Journal of Radiology, vol. 95, no. 1139, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211251

[7] G. Aspelund and J. C. Langer, "Current management of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis," Seminars in Pediatric Surgery, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 27–33, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2006.10.004

[8] J. Hom, S. H. F. Lam, K. M. Delaney, J. A. Koos, and S. Kunkov, "Vomiting, Pyloric Mass, and Point-of-Care Ultrasound: Diagnostic Test Accuracy for Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis—A Meta-Analysis," The Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. e427–e431, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.06.001

MediAI | Medical Imaging & AI Healthcare Insight

Published by ScholarGen Inc.

Generating Knowledge Across Generations.