Spinal Epidural Angiolipoma: MRI Diagnosis of a Posterior Epidural Mass Causing Progressive Leg Weakness
Executive Answer
Spinal epidural angiolipoma is a rare benign spinal tumor composed of mature adipose tissue and vascular components. The characteristic imaging pattern is a posterior epidural mass containing both fat and enhancing vascular tissue, often producing spinal cord compression. In this case, a woman in her late 50s presented with progressive bilateral leg weakness and sensory disturbance. MRI demonstrated a spindle-shaped posterior epidural mass extending from T6 to T8, compressing the spinal cord. Mixed T1 signal, T2 hyperintensity, and heterogeneous enhancement strongly supported the diagnosis. Recognizing the combination of epidural location + fat + vascular enhancement + cord compression is more useful than identifying fat alone.
Why This Case Matters
A patient with progressive bilateral leg weakness does not always have degenerative lumbar spine disease.
That distinction matters.
When weakness progresses over time and is accompanied by sensory disturbance or gait impairment, the anatomical level of the lesion becomes a critical diagnostic question. A lesion in the thoracic spinal canal can produce bilateral lower-extremity symptoms even when the patient does not initially report prominent thoracic pain.
This case illustrates an important radiologic principle:
The location of a spinal mass may be more diagnostically informative than its size.
The lesion in this case was located in the posterior epidural space of the thoracic spine, extending from T6 through T8 and compressing the spinal cord.
The combination of clinical progression and MRI localization redirected the diagnostic pathway from common degenerative disease toward an epidural mass lesion.
Spinal epidural angiolipoma is uncommon, but its imaging characteristics can be sufficiently distinctive to allow a focused differential diagnosis.
The key is to recognize the pattern rather than relying on a single MRI signal characteristic.
Clinical Scenario
A woman in her late 50s presented with:
Progressive bilateral lower-extremity weakness
Sensory disturbance
Progressive neurological symptoms
MRI demonstrated a relatively long, spindle-shaped mass within the posterior epidural space of the thoracic spine.
The lesion extended from T6 to T8 and displaced the spinal cord anteriorly.
This clinical-radiologic combination is important because progressive bilateral leg weakness suggests a possible spinal cord process rather than an isolated peripheral or lumbar degenerative disorder.
Potential warning features of thoracic cord compression include:
Progressive bilateral leg weakness
Bilateral sensory disturbance
Gait difficulty
Spasticity
A sensory level
Bladder or bowel dysfunction
Rapid neurological deterioration
The word progressive deserves particular attention.
A slowly enlarging benign epidural tumor can still produce clinically important neurological damage because its biological behavior and its mechanical effect on the spinal cord are two different issues.
What Is a Spinal Epidural Angiolipoma?
Spinal epidural angiolipoma is a rare benign tumor containing two principal tissue components:
Mature adipose tissue
Vascular tissue
This mixed composition explains the characteristic MRI appearance.
A conventional lipoma is predominantly composed of fat and therefore tends to demonstrate relatively homogeneous fat signal.
An angiolipoma contains both fat and vascular tissue. Consequently, the lesion may demonstrate:
T1 hyperintense fatty areas
Relatively lower-signal nonfatty areas
T2 hyperintensity in portions of the lesion
Enhancement of vascular components
Heterogeneous overall signal characteristics
This tissue composition is central to the diagnosis.
The lesion should therefore not be interpreted simply as a "fat-containing epidural mass."
The more informative description is:
A posterior epidural mass containing both fatty and vascular components, with enhancement and spinal cord compression.
Where Does Spinal Epidural Angiolipoma Usually Occur?
Spinal epidural angiolipomas have a recognized predilection for the thoracic posterior epidural space.
Reported patients are often adults in the fourth through sixth decades, with female predominance described in several clinical series. However, age, sex, and spinal level should be regarded as supportive epidemiologic features rather than diagnostic criteria.
The actual diagnostic weight should be placed on imaging localization and tissue characterization.
In this case, the lesion's location was highly informative:
Thoracic spine → posterior epidural compartment → longitudinal extension → spinal cord compression.
That sequence immediately narrows the differential diagnosis.
Longitudinal Posterior Epidural Mass
Figure 1. Sagittal MRI demonstrating a T6–T8 posterior epidural spindle-shaped mass with anterior displacement and compression of the spinal cord.
Radiologic Interpretation
On sagittal MRI, the lesion extends longitudinally along the posterior epidural space from approximately T6 to T8.
The mass is located posterior to the spinal cord and produces anterior displacement and compression.
Several features should be recognized together:
Posterior epidural location
Spindle-shaped configuration
Longitudinal extension
Thoracic location
Spinal cord compression
Mixed fatty and vascular tissue characteristics
A posterior epidural spindle-shaped mass with this distribution should prompt consideration of spinal epidural angiolipoma.
The lesion's morphology is particularly useful because a typical degenerative disc abnormality would not normally produce this elongated posterior epidural mass pattern.
MRI Tissue Characterization: Why T1 Signal Matters
MRI is the principal imaging modality for evaluating this lesion because it can simultaneously characterize:
Anatomical compartment
Fat
Vascular tissue
Cord compression
Neural foraminal extension
Relationship to adjacent structures
T1-Weighted MRI
One of the most useful observations is the mixed T1 signal.
Fat typically appears hyperintense on T1-weighted MRI.
Therefore, T1-hyperintense portions of the lesion suggest a fatty component.
At the same time, relatively lower-signal portions may correspond to nonfatty vascular tissue.
This creates a useful diagnostic concept:
T1 bright + T1 relatively dark components = consider mixed tissue composition.
When the nonfatty component also demonstrates enhancement, the combination becomes particularly suggestive of angiolipoma.
The diagnostic reasoning is therefore not:
"T1 hyperintense = lipoma."
Instead:
"T1 hyperintense fat + enhancing vascular tissue within a posterior epidural mass = consider spinal epidural angiolipoma."
Axial T2-Weighted MRI
Figure 2. Axial T2-weighted MRI demonstrating a posterior epidural mass compressing the spinal cord and reducing the available spinal canal space.
Radiologic Interpretation
The axial plane provides a different but equally important perspective.
Here, the radiologist should determine:
Which side of the canal contains the lesion?
Is the lesion epidural?
How severely is the spinal cord compressed?
Is the cord displaced or flattened?
Is the dura distinguishable?
Is there neural foraminal extension?
Is there associated spinal cord signal abnormality?
The posterior epidural location is particularly important.
A lesion that arises posteriorly and pushes the spinal cord anteriorly provides a different differential diagnosis from an anterior epidural mass or intradural extramedullary tumor.
Axial imaging therefore complements sagittal imaging by establishing the lesion's compartment and mechanical relationship to the spinal cord.
Post-Contrast T1-Weighted Fat-Suppressed MRI
Figure 3. Post-contrast T1-weighted fat-suppressed MRI demonstrating heterogeneous enhancement of the vascular component within the epidural mass.
Radiologic Interpretation
Contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging is particularly useful for identifying the vascular component.
The fatty component itself is not expected to be the principal source of enhancement.
Instead, enhancement within the nonfatty component supports the presence of vascular tissue.
This creates a highly informative imaging combination:
Fat signal + vascular enhancement.
When this combination occurs within a posterior thoracic epidural mass, spinal epidural angiolipoma should move high in the differential diagnosis.
The Five-Step MRI Approach to a Fat-Containing Epidural Mass
A practical approach can reduce diagnostic uncertainty.
Step 1: Identify the Compartment
Ask:
Intramedullary?
Intradural extramedullary?
Epidural?
In this case:
Epidural.
Step 2: Determine the Location
Ask:
Anterior or posterior?
Cervical, thoracic, or lumbar?
Focal or longitudinal?
In this case:
Posterior thoracic epidural space with longitudinal extension.
Step 3: Identify Fat
Ask:
Is there T1 hyperintensity?
Does the signal behave like fat?
Is there fat suppression?
A T1-hyperintense component supports the presence of fat.
Step 4: Identify the Vascular Component
Ask:
Is there a nonfatty component?
Does it enhance?
Is enhancement heterogeneous?
Enhancing nonfatty tissue supports a vascular component.
Step 5: Assess Cord Compression
Finally, ask:
Is the spinal cord compressed?
Is it displaced?
Is there cord signal abnormality?
Does the imaging correlate with the patient's neurological symptoms?
The diagnosis becomes much stronger when the anatomical and clinical findings agree.
Why Can Spinal Epidural Angiolipoma Be Missed?
The rarity of the tumor itself can contribute to diagnostic difficulty.
A patient with leg weakness may initially be evaluated for more common conditions.
Potential cognitive traps include:
1. Anchoring on Degenerative Spine Disease
Common disorders are often considered first.
However, progressive bilateral neurological symptoms should trigger reassessment of the presumed diagnosis.
2. Focusing on Fat Alone
A fat-containing lesion may be prematurely labeled as a lipoma.
The vascular component must be evaluated.
3. Incomplete Compartment Analysis
Recognizing that a lesion is "near the spine" is insufficient.
The radiologist should explicitly determine whether it is:
Intramedullary
Intradural extramedullary
Epidural
4. Underestimating Cord Compression
A benign tumor can still be clinically significant if it compresses the spinal cord.
5. Failing to Correlate the Imaging With Symptoms
The lesion should be interpreted in relation to the neurological level and symptom pattern.
Differential Diagnosis
A posterior epidural mass may have a broad differential diagnosis.
Relevant considerations include:
Herniated disc
Ligamentum flavum hypertrophy
Synovial cyst
Epidural abscess
Tuberculous abscess
Fungal infection
Lipoma
Angiolipoma
Hemangioma
Arteriovenous malformation or fistula
Arachnoid cyst
Dermoid cyst
Epidermoid cyst
Lymphoma
Metastasis
Hematoma
Dilated venous plexus
The differential should be narrowed using compartment + location + tissue composition + enhancement + clinical course.
Lipoma vs. Angiolipoma
| Feature | Lipoma | Angiolipoma |
|---|---|---|
| Main tissue | Fat | Fat + vascular tissue |
| T1 signal | Usually homogeneous hyperintensity | Mixed signal |
| Vascular component | Limited | Prominent |
| Enhancement | Usually limited | Enhancement of vascular component |
| Typical epidural location | Variable | Posterior epidural space is characteristic |
| Diagnostic clue | Predominantly fat | Fat plus enhancing vascular tissue |
The practical distinction is simple:
A predominantly fatty lesion suggests lipoma.
A fatty lesion with a distinct enhancing vascular component should raise consideration of angiolipoma.
Hemangioma vs. Angiolipoma
Both lesions may contain substantial vascular tissue and demonstrate enhancement.
The differentiating feature is the presence of significant fat.
A strongly vascular lesion should not automatically be labeled a hemangioma.
The radiologist should ask:
Where is the fat?
If both vascular and fatty components are convincingly demonstrated, angiolipoma becomes an important consideration.
Epidural Abscess and Hematoma
Epidural abscess can demonstrate T2 hyperintensity and enhancement, but the clinical setting is usually different.
Important contextual features include:
Fever
Infection
Elevated inflammatory markers
Adjacent soft-tissue inflammatory changes
An epidural hematoma can also produce acute neurological symptoms.
Signal characteristics vary according to the age of the blood products.
This creates an important clinical distinction:
Gradually progressive neurological symptoms + characteristic fat/vascular imaging pattern favor a mass such as angiolipoma.
Sudden neurological deterioration should prompt consideration of hemorrhage or hematoma, including possible hemorrhage within a vascular lesion.
When Is CT Useful?
MRI remains the key examination for characterization of spinal epidural angiolipoma.
CT can provide complementary information regarding:
Bone involvement
Vertebral remodeling
Neural foraminal widening
Calcification
Osseous destruction
Surgical anatomy
The presence of fat on CT can support the interpretation, but CT alone should not be used to diagnose angiolipoma solely from the presence of fat.
An important question is whether the lesion is noninvasive or infiltrative.
Bone destruction or substantial osseous involvement should prompt reconsideration of the differential diagnosis and the lesion's biological behavior.
Clinical Significance: Benign Does Not Mean Clinically Harmless
Spinal epidural angiolipoma is generally considered a benign lesion.
However, benign pathology does not eliminate the risk of neurological dysfunction.
The problem is mechanical.
As the mass enlarges within the epidural space, it can progressively compress the spinal cord.
Persistent compression may produce:
Motor weakness
Sensory disturbance
Gait impairment
Myelopathy
Sphincter dysfunction
In severe cases, paralysis
This explains why the phrase "benign spinal tumor" should never be interpreted in isolation.
The clinical question is not simply:
Is the tumor malignant?
It is also:
Is the lesion producing clinically significant neural compression?
Treatment and Surgical Considerations
For symptomatic spinal epidural angiolipoma associated with spinal cord compression, surgical decompression and tumor removal are central treatment considerations.
In the reported case, laminectomy and tumor resection were described, with successful treatment.
The surgical objective is not merely removal of a benign mass.
The principal goals are:
Relieve spinal cord compression
Prevent further neurological deterioration
Preserve neurological structures
Obtain pathological confirmation when appropriate
Achieve safe tumor control
Posterior epidural lesions are commonly approached through posterior decompression, with the precise surgical strategy determined by lesion extent, vascularity, foraminal involvement, and whether an infiltrative pattern is present.
Does Complete Resection Always Have to Be the Goal?
Not necessarily at the expense of neurological structures.
When the lesion is well circumscribed and safely separable from adjacent structures, gross total resection may be feasible.
However, infiltrative lesions or lesions with complex vascular relationships may require a maximal safe resection strategy.
The surgical principle is therefore:
Tumor control should be balanced against preservation of neurological function.
Available surgical series have generally reported favorable neurological outcomes, but the evidence base consists largely of case reports and retrospective series rather than randomized clinical trials.
Therefore, reported outcomes should not be interpreted as guarantees for an individual patient.
Is Radiation Therapy or Chemotherapy Required?
For conventional spinal epidural angiolipoma, surgery is generally the principal treatment when neurological compression is clinically significant.
Routine postoperative radiation therapy or systemic chemotherapy is not the standard management approach for a typical benign angiolipoma.
The management pathway depends on the actual pathology, extent of resection, neurological status, and clinical context.
Diagnostic Risk: Where Could the Diagnosis Go Wrong?
The most important diagnostic risk is not failure to recognize an obscure tumor name.
It is failure to recognize the anatomical pattern.
A patient with bilateral leg weakness can be repeatedly evaluated for degenerative disease if the imaging review remains focused on common lumbar abnormalities.
A second risk is stopping at the observation that "fat is present."
Fat is a tissue characteristic, not a complete diagnosis.
The radiologist should systematically evaluate:
Compartment → Location → Fat → Vascularity → Enhancement → Cord compression → Clinical correlation
This sequence can reduce premature closure.
AI Perspective: Could AI Help Detect This Lesion?
Artificial intelligence could potentially support the evaluation of spinal MRI, but this case also demonstrates why rare-lesion detection is difficult for automated systems.
A future AI-assisted workflow could potentially help with:
Detection of epidural masses
Anatomical localization
Spinal canal segmentation
Quantification of cord compression
Identification of fat-containing lesions
Comparison with prior MRI
Detection of interval growth
Worklist prioritization
However, a rare spinal epidural angiolipoma represents a challenging AI problem.
A model trained primarily on common spinal disorders may encounter limited examples of rare lesions.
Potential failure modes include:
False Negative
The system may fail to recognize an uncommon lesion because the imaging appearance is underrepresented in its training data.
Anatomical Mislocalization
The model may identify a mass but incorrectly classify it as intradural or epidural.
Domain Shift
Performance may change across scanners, institutions, imaging protocols, field strengths, and patient populations.
Automation Bias
A radiologist may give excessive weight to an AI result that labels the examination as low risk.
Alert Fatigue
If AI generates too many nonspecific alerts, clinically meaningful findings may receive insufficient attention.
Therefore, AI should be regarded as a detection and workflow-support technology, not an autonomous replacement for radiologic interpretation.
The radiologist must verify:
Lesion location
Tissue composition
Enhancement pattern
Cord compression
Clinical correlation
Differential diagnosis
AI Workflow Opportunity
A practical enterprise imaging workflow could be conceptualized as:
DICOM → PACS → AI orchestration → MRI analysis → structured finding → PACS visualization → Radiologist → RIS → EHR/EMR
For this type of rare lesion, the most useful AI role may not be automated diagnosis.
Instead, AI could assist with attention allocation.
For example, an AI system might flag:
Posterior epidural mass with potential spinal cord compression.
The radiologist would then perform the tissue characterization necessary to determine whether the lesion contains fat, vascular tissue, hemorrhage, or another tissue type.
This is a more realistic model of clinical AI:
AI identifies or prioritizes.
The radiologist interprets and decides.
Practical Radiology Pearls
Pearl 1
A posterior thoracic epidural mass should immediately be localized anatomically before signal characteristics are interpreted.
Pearl 2
T1 hyperintensity suggests fat, but fat alone does not establish angiolipoma.
Pearl 3
The combination of fat and an enhancing vascular component is the critical imaging clue.
Pearl 4
A spindle-shaped, longitudinally extending posterior epidural lesion is an important morphological pattern.
Pearl 5
Always assess the degree of spinal cord compression.
Pearl 6
Progressive bilateral leg weakness should raise concern for thoracic myelopathy when the imaging level fits.
Pearl 7
Sudden neurological deterioration may indicate hemorrhage and should broaden the differential.
Pearl 8
A benign spinal tumor can still require timely treatment when it produces significant cord compression.
Common Diagnostic Pitfalls
Calling every T1-hyperintense epidural lesion a lipoma.
Ignoring the posterior epidural compartment.
Failing to evaluate enhancement.
Failing to assess spinal cord compression.
Anchoring on degenerative lumbar disease.
Ignoring the longitudinal extent of the lesion.
Missing foraminal extension.
Assuming benign pathology means no clinical urgency.
Overrelying on AI classification without reviewing the images.
Failing to correlate the neurological level with the MRI abnormality.
Featured Snippet Answers
What is the key MRI finding of spinal epidural angiolipoma?
The key MRI pattern is a posterior epidural mass containing both fatty and vascular components. Fat typically produces T1 hyperintensity, while the vascular component may appear relatively lower in signal and demonstrate enhancement. When this pattern occurs in a thoracic posterior epidural spindle-shaped mass producing spinal cord compression, spinal epidural angiolipoma should be considered.
What is the most important differential diagnosis?
The differential diagnosis includes lipoma, hemangioma, epidural abscess, hematoma, metastasis, lymphoma, vascular malformation, and other epidural masses. The most useful discriminators are anatomical compartment, posterior versus anterior location, fat content, vascular enhancement, bone involvement, and the clinical time course.
When is CT useful?
CT is complementary to MRI. It can help evaluate osseous involvement, remodeling, neural foraminal widening, calcification, bone destruction, and surgical anatomy. CT detection of fat may support the diagnosis, but the combination of MRI tissue characterization and contrast enhancement is more informative for distinguishing angiolipoma from other epidural lesions.
Why is MRI particularly important?
MRI can localize the lesion to the epidural compartment, demonstrate its relationship to the spinal cord, characterize fat, identify vascular enhancement, assess foraminal extension, and evaluate possible cord signal abnormality. These combined features make MRI the central imaging modality for diagnostic assessment.
FAQ
1. Is spinal epidural angiolipoma cancer?
Spinal epidural angiolipoma is generally a benign tumor composed of mature adipose and vascular tissue. Its clinical importance comes primarily from its potential to compress the spinal cord rather than from malignant behavior.
2. Where does spinal epidural angiolipoma usually occur?
It is most commonly described in the thoracic posterior epidural space, although lesions can occur at other spinal levels.
3. What does angiolipoma look like on T1 MRI?
It typically demonstrates mixed signal because it combines fat and vascular tissue. Fatty areas tend to be T1 hyperintense, while nonfatty vascular components may be relatively lower in signal.
4. Does spinal epidural angiolipoma enhance?
The vascular component can demonstrate contrast enhancement, often producing heterogeneous enhancement.
5. Can angiolipoma cause leg weakness?
Yes. A thoracic epidural lesion can compress the spinal cord and produce progressive bilateral lower-extremity weakness, sensory disturbance, gait impairment, and other myelopathic symptoms.
6. Is surgery necessary?
Management depends on symptoms, neurological findings, lesion extent, and degree of cord compression. When clinically significant neurological compression is present, surgical decompression and resection are central treatment considerations.
7. Can spinal epidural angiolipoma bleed?
Hemorrhagic presentations have been reported. Sudden neurological deterioration in a patient with a known or suspected vascular spinal lesion should therefore prompt consideration of hemorrhage.
8. Can AI diagnose spinal epidural angiolipoma?
AI may potentially assist with detection, localization, segmentation, and workflow prioritization, but rare lesions remain challenging for automated systems. Human radiologic verification remains essential.
Quiz
1. Which anatomical compartment contains the lesion? A woman in her late 50s presents with progressive bilateral leg weakness and sensory disturbance. MRI shows a spindle-shaped mass from T6 to T8, located posterior to the spinal cord and causing anterior cord compression.
(1) Intramedullary
(2) Intradural extramedullary
(3) Epidural
(4) Vertebral body
Answer: (3) Epidural. Explanation: The mass is located in the posterior epidural space and compresses the spinal cord anteriorly. Establishing the anatomical compartment is the first step in narrowing the differential diagnosis.
2. Which MRI finding most strongly indicates a fatty component? The mass demonstrates areas of high signal intensity on T1-weighted MRI.
(1) Fat
(2) Simple fluid
(3) Calcification
(4) Air
Answer: (1) Fat. Explanation: Mature adipose tissue typically appears hyperintense on T1-weighted MRI. In spinal epidural angiolipoma, the fatty component is combined with a vascular soft-tissue component, producing a characteristic mixed-tissue appearance.
3. Which diagnosis best explains the complete MRI pattern? MRI demonstrates a T6–T8 posterior epidural spindle-shaped mass with a fatty component, a nonfatty vascular component, heterogeneous contrast enhancement, and spinal cord compression.
(1) Epidural abscess
(2) Herniated disc
(3) Ligamentum flavum hypertrophy
(4) Epidural lipoma
(5) Spinal epidural angiolipomaAnswer: (5) Spinal epidural angiolipoma. Explanation: The combination of a posterior epidural location, macroscopic fat, a vascular nonfatty component, heterogeneous enhancement, and spinal cord compression strongly supports spinal epidural angiolipoma. The key diagnostic concept is the coexistence of fat and vascular tissue within an epidural mass.
Key Takeaways
Spinal epidural angiolipoma is rare, but its imaging pattern can be highly informative.
The most useful diagnostic sequence is:
Posterior epidural location
→ Thoracic level
→ Spindle-shaped longitudinal extension
→ Fat on T1
→ Vascular/nonfatty component
→ Enhancement
→ Spinal cord compression
→ Clinical-radiologic correlation
The most important lesson from this case is not simply to memorize the name of a rare tumor.
It is to recognize a tissue-composition pattern within an anatomical compartment.
When progressive bilateral leg weakness is accompanied by a posterior thoracic epidural mass, the radiologist should carefully evaluate whether the lesion contains both fat and vascular tissue.
That combination can transform a broad differential diagnosis into a focused diagnosis.
At the same time, the clinical significance lies in the cord compression. A benign tumor can produce substantial neurological morbidity when diagnosis or decompression is delayed.
For medical AI, the case offers a complementary lesson: rare lesions may be difficult for automated systems, making localization, segmentation, attention support, and second-reader functions more realistic applications than autonomous diagnosis.
The radiologist remains responsible for integrating the imaging pattern, clinical presentation, differential diagnosis, and management implications.
Continue Learning
If you want to understand spinal MRI localization
MRI of Spinal Cord Compression: A Practical Radiology Approach
If you want to understand epidural differential diagnosis
Posterior Epidural Spinal Masses: Imaging Differential Diagnosis
If you want to understand AI in spine imaging
How AI Can Support Spine MRI Interpretation and Radiology Workflow
Medical Disclaimer
This article is provided for educational and medical-imaging information only. It does not replace individualized evaluation by a qualified physician, radiologist, neurosurgeon, or other healthcare professional.
Symptoms, MRI and CT findings, treatment decisions, and prognosis must be interpreted in the context of the individual patient's clinical condition.
References
Gala FB, Aswani Y. Imaging in spinal posterior epidural space lesions: A pictorial essay. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging. 2016;26(3):299–315. doi:10.4103/0971-3026.190406.
Hu S, Hu CH, Hu XY, et al. MRI features of spinal epidural angiolipomas. Korean Journal of Radiology. 2013;14(5):810–817. doi:10.3348/kjr.2013.14.5.810.
Preul MC, Leblanc R, Tampieri D, Robitaille Y, Pokrupa R. Spinal angiolipomas: Report of three cases. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1993;78(2):280–286. doi:10.3171/jns.1993.78.2.0280.
Garg M, Gupta V, Gaikwad S, et al. Spinal angiolipoma: Report of three cases and review of MRI features. Australasian Radiology. 2002;46:84–90. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1673.2001.01001.x.
Gelabert-González M, García-Allut A. Spinal extradural angiolipoma: Report of two cases and review of the literature. European Spine Journal. 2009;18(3):324–335. doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0858-8.
Bouali S, Maatar N, Bouhoula A, et al. Spinal epidural angiolipomas: Clinical characteristics, management and outcomes. Asian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2016;11(4):348–351. doi:10.4103/1793-5482.180901.
da Costa MDS, de Paz DA, Rodrigues TP, et al. Hemorrhagic onset of spinal angiolipoma. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2014;21(6):913–915. doi:10.3171/2014.9.SPINE131162.
Yang T, Niu C. Microsurgical treatment for spinal epidural angiolipomas. Acta Neurologica Belgica. 2021;121(2):421–427. doi:10.1007/s13760-019-01192-6.
Wang K, Shi L, Su Y, Wang H, Liu L. Clinical features and surgical outcomes of spinal epidural angiolipomas. Acta Neurologica Belgica. 2023;123(1):115–120. doi:10.1007/s13760-021-01689-z.
Samdani AF, Garonzik IM, Jallo GJ, et al. Spinal angiolipoma: Case report and review of the literature. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2004;146(3):299–302. doi:10.1007/s00701-003-0196-x.
Comments
Post a Comment