Decoding May-Thurner Syndrome: A Comprehensive Guide to Iliac Vein Compression

May-Thurner Syndrome (MTS), also known as Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome or Cockett Syndrome, represents a critical, often underdiagnosed, vascular condition that is a significant predisposing factor for Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) in the lower extremities, particularly the left leg. This expert column, drawing on the latest international medical literature, provides a deep dive into the pathophysiology, clinical spectrum, diagnostic imaging, and modern endovascular management of MTS, offering essential knowledge for medical professionals and a detailed understanding for affected patients.


Understanding May-Thurner Syndrome: A Critical Anatomical Variant

May-Thurner Syndrome is a disorder caused by the extrinsic compression of a deep vein, most commonly the left common iliac vein (LCIV), which is squeezed between the overlying right common iliac artery (RCIA) and the underlying fifth lumbar vertebral body or sacral promontory. This chronic mechanical irritation, coupled with the pulsatile pressure from the artery, can lead to the formation of internal fibrous bands or "spurs" within the vein lumen, further narrowing the vessel and impeding venous return. This obstruction, whether non-thrombotic (NIVL) or complicated by thrombosis, leads to venous hypertension in the affected leg.

The case study provided highlights a classic presentation: a 64-year-old woman with chronic left-leg swelling, pelvic pain, and a history of recurrent DVT, ultimately diagnosed with MTS.


Pathophysiology: The Mechanics of Venous Obstruction

The fundamental pathology of MTS is the chronic external compression of the left common iliac vein. This anatomical variation, while present in up to 22-24% of the population, only becomes symptomatic in a fraction of individuals—thus transitioning from an anatomical finding to a clinical syndrome.

  1. Mechanical Compression: The left common iliac vein is compressed between the right common iliac artery anteriorly and the lumbar spine (vertebra L5) posteriorly. This is the most common variant (approximately 84% of cases). Other, rarer variants involve compression of the right iliac vein or the inferior vena cava (IVC).

  2. Endothelial Injury and Spur Formation: The chronic, pulsatile trauma from the overlying artery causes repetitive injury to the vein wall endothelium. This leads to an inflammatory response, intimal thickening, and the development of fibrous venous spurs or webs within the vein lumen, which significantly contribute to or cause the stenosis.

  3. Thrombosis Risk (Virchow's Triad): The resulting stenosis creates an area of low blood flow (venous stasis) and the internal spurs contribute to endothelial damage. These two factors, combined with a hypercoagulable state (e.g., use of oral contraceptives, pregnancy, thrombophilia), complete the key elements of Virchow's Triad, greatly increasing the risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT). The subsequent DVT, often extensive (iliofemoral), can lead to chronic, disabling Post-Thrombotic Syndrome (PTS).


Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation

Epidemiology

While the prevalence of the anatomical compression itself is high (around 22-24%), the true incidence and prevalence of symptomatic MTS are not well-established, suggesting it is likely underdiagnosed.

  • Gender and Age: MTS is most commonly diagnosed in women (up to 72% in some series) and typically presents in their 3rd to 5th decades of life, though it is not confined to this group. The lower position of the RCIA in women is a proposed risk factor.

  • Risk Factors: Conditions that increase thrombotic risk are critical co-factors, including oral contraceptive use, pregnancy, dehydration, immobilization, and inherited thrombophilias.

  • DVT Link: MTS is a significant factor for left-sided DVT, being 3 to 8 times more common than right-sided DVT. It is estimated to affect 18–49% of patients who present with a left lower extremity DVT.

Clinical Presentation

The presentation is highly variable, ranging from completely asymptomatic compression to acute, life-threatening DVT.

  • Common Symptoms (Chronic Venous Insufficiency):

    • Unilateral Left Lower Extremity Swelling (Edema): Often the first and most prominent symptom, potentially progressive and exacerbated by activity.

    • Pain/Heaviness: A feeling of tightness or heaviness in the left leg.

    • Venous Claudication: Cramping pain in the thigh or calf with exercise, relieved by rest and leg elevation.

    • Skin Changes: Hyperpigmentation, varicose veins (especially recurrent), or venous stasis ulcers in chronic cases.

  • Acute Presentation: Acute DVT of the left iliofemoral system, presenting with sudden, severe pain, swelling, and warmth.

MTS is categorized into three clinical stages based on severity: (I) Asymptomatic compression, (II) Formation of a venous spur, and (III) Left lower extremity DVT.


Imaging Features and Diagnosis

The diagnosis of MTS moves beyond simple clinical suspicion and relies heavily on sophisticated imaging to confirm the compression and evaluate for thrombosis.

Imaging Modalities

  1. Duplex Ultrasound: Recommended as the initial screening tool due to its non-invasive nature. It is used to assess for DVT and venous stenosis, although visualization of the iliac veins can be challenging.

  2. CT Venography (CTV) and MR Venography (MRV): These cross-sectional modalities are more sensitive and specific than ultrasound and are often used as follow-up studies. They clearly visualize the extent of stenosis, the exact anatomical cause (e.g., compression by the RCIA), and the presence of associated DVT.

    • Key Finding: Abrupt narrowing or "beaking" of the pelvic vein due to external compression by the artery.

    • Case Study Finding (Pre-Treatment): CT of the abdomen/pelvis showed occlusion of the left common iliac vein due to compression between the overlying right common iliac artery and the underlying lumbar vertebra.


Figure 1. Abdomen and Pelvis Contrast-Enhanced CT (Pre-Treatment): Axial images (A-D) demonstrate the extrinsic compression on the left common iliac vein, leading to severe stenosis or occlusion, a characteristic finding in May-Thurner Syndrome.

  1. Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) and Catheter Venography: IVUS is now considered the gold standard for confirming MTS before intervention. It provides precise, high-resolution measurements of the vein lumen diameter, cross-sectional area, and the extent of internal spurs. Catheter Venography is the traditional standard but is invasive and usually reserved for the time of the endovascular procedure.

Differential Diagnosis

Symptoms of left lower extremity swelling and DVT can mimic several other conditions. Key differential diagnoses include:

  • Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) from other causes: Coagulation disorders, immobilization, or trauma.

  • Chronic Venous Insufficiency (CVI): Due to valvular incompetence.

  • External Compression from other Pelvic Masses: Such as a tumor or lymphadenopathy.

  • Lymphedema: Swelling due to lymphatic system dysfunction.


Treatment and Prognosis: The Endovascular Revolution

The management of MTS is dictated by the severity of symptoms and the presence of DVT. Modern treatment overwhelmingly favors minimally invasive endovascular therapy.

Conservative and Medical Management

  • Asymptomatic/Mild Symptoms (Non-Thrombotic): Conservative therapy, primarily using compression stockings and lifestyle modifications, is recommended.

  • DVT Management: Anticoagulation is the cornerstone for treating associated DVT to prevent recurrence and pulmonary embolism (PE).

 Interventional Management (Mainstay of Treatment)

For symptomatic patients (moderate to severe) and those with DVT, Endovascular Stenting is the recommended frontline treatment.

  1. Thrombus Removal (If DVT is Present): If acute DVT is present, initial efforts focus on clearing the thrombus to preserve venous valve function and minimize the risk of Post-Thrombotic Syndrome. This is achieved using:

    • Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (CDT): Infusion of clot-dissolving drugs directly into the thrombus.

    • Mechanical Thrombectomy: Physical removal of the clot.

  2. Venous Stenting: Following clot removal or for non-thrombotic but symptomatic compression, iliac vein stenting (percutaneous transluminal venous angioplasty and stent placement) is performed to mechanically relieve the compression.

    • Case Study Treatment: The patient underwent endovascular stenting in both common iliac veins to treat the compression.



Figure 2. CT Venography (CTV) of the Abdomen and Pelvis (Post-Treatment): Axial images (A-C) reveal the successful restoration of bilateral common iliac vein patency following the placement of endovascular stents, confirming the resolution of the obstruction caused by May-Thurner Syndrome.

Prognosis

The prognosis following modern endovascular stenting is excellent.

  • Technical Success: Reported technical success rates are high, averaging 95%.

  • Patency Rates: Long-term results are favorable, with 1-year patency rates around 96%.

  • Symptom Resolution: Most patients experience significant resolution of symptoms, including edema and pain, improving quality of life. Untreated or recurrent thrombosis, however, carries a high risk of developing disabling Post-Thrombotic Syndrome.


Quiz

Question 1. A 64-year-old female presents with a history of left lower extremity swelling, pelvic pain, and recurrent DVT. Contrast-enhanced CT confirms a diagnosis of May-Thurner Syndrome. The most prominent underlying anatomical abnormality observed on imaging is:

A. Arterial thrombosis of the Right Common Iliac Artery. 

B. External compression of the Left Common Iliac Vein. 

C. Severe right-sided lymphedema. 

D. A large pelvic tumor causing compression.

Question 2. The structure responsible for the external compression of the vein in the most common variant of May-Thurner Syndrome is the:

A. Aorta. 

B. Right Common Iliac Artery. 

C. Inferior Vena Cava. 

D. Left Common Iliac Artery.

Question 3. For a patient with symptomatic May-Thurner Syndrome and a recent history of DVT, the recommended definitive treatment to correct the anatomical defect and reduce recurrence is:

A. Long-term Warfarin therapy alone. 

B. Open surgical repair with a venous graft placement. 

C. Endovascular Stenting of the compressed iliac vein. 

D. Placement of an Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) filter.

Answer & Explanation

1. Answer: B. External compression of the Left Common Iliac Vein. Explanation: May-Thurner Syndrome (MTS) is pathologically defined by the external compression of the left common iliac vein, typically between the overlying right common iliac artery and the underlying lumbar spine. The imaging in the case study specifically showed left common iliac vein occlusion due to this compression.

2. Answer: B. Right Common Iliac Artery. Explanation: The characteristic anatomical variant of MTS involves the compression of the left common iliac vein by the overlying right common iliac artery against the lumbar vertebra.

3. Answer: C. Endovascular Stenting of the compressed iliac vein. Explanation: While anticoagulation (Warfarin) is essential for treating DVT, the definitive treatment for symptomatic May-Thurner Syndrome is to correct the underlying anatomical obstruction. Current expert consensus and the case study's resolution overwhelmingly point to endovascular stenting as the frontline, minimally invasive therapy with excellent long-term patency rates.


Reference

1. A. Mangla and H. Hamad, “May-Thurner Syndrome,” StatPearls [Internet], Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing, 2024.

2. V. Poyyamoli, A. A. Eapen, and M. K. K. Kumar, “May-Thurner syndrome,” Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1104–1111, Aug. 2021.

3. M. G. Knuttinen, L. P. Naidu, S. C. Cook, and J. R. Arepally, “May-Thurner: diagnosis and endovascular management,” Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 320–327, Aug. 2015.

4. F. H. G. Av, and O. C. C. C. Pi, “May-Thurner diagnosis and management,” Phlebolymphology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2020.

5. M. C. M. M. S. W., “May-Thurner syndrome: update and review,” asc. Med., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 192–195, Aug. 2013.

6. H. G. O. P. R. A. B. H. M. P. S., “May-Thurner Syndrome: Case Report and Review of the Literature Involving Modern Endovascular Therapy,” J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 637–642, May 2009.

7. K. H. P. A. S. V., “Endovascular Management of May-Thurner Syndrome,” J. Emerg. Trauma Shock, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 160–163, Apr. 2012.

Comments