Testicular Epidermoid Cyst: Imaging Diagnosis, Differential Diagnosis, and Evidence-Based Management
Introduction
Testicular epidermoid cyst is a rare,
benign intratesticular lesion that accounts for approximately 1–2% of all
testicular tumors. Despite its benign nature, it represents a critical
diagnostic challenge because its imaging appearance may overlap with
malignant germ cell tumors. An accurate diagnosis is essential to avoid
unnecessary radical orchiectomy, particularly in young men of reproductive
age.
With the evolution of high-resolution scrotal ultrasound and multiparametric MRI, testicular epidermoid cyst has become one of the few testicular lesions that can be confidently diagnosed preoperatively. This column provides a comprehensive, evidence-based review of testicular epidermoid cyst, focusing on pathophysiology, epidemiology, clinical presentation, imaging features, differential diagnosis, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis, based on the most authoritative and recent global literature.
Pathophysiology
A testicular epidermoid cyst is a benign epithelial-lined cyst
containing keratin debris. Histologically, it is composed of:
- A fibrous capsule
- Lining of stratified
squamous epithelium
- Keratinized debris within
the lumen
- Absence of
skin appendages
(distinguishing it from dermoid cyst)
The origin remains controversial. The most widely accepted theories
include:
- Monodermal
variant of teratoma (currently
less favored)
- Congenital
inclusion of ectodermal tissue
- Post-traumatic
or inflammatory epithelial inclusion
Crucially, no malignant germ cell components are present, which
explains the excellent prognosis.
Epidemiology
- Incidence: ~1–2% of
testicular tumors
- Age: Most commonly
diagnosed in second to fourth decades
- Laterality: Slight right-sided
predominance
- Tumor markers: AFP,
β-hCG, LDH are normal
- Pediatric cases: Rare but
documented
Given its rarity, testicular epidermoid cyst is frequently misdiagnosed as
malignant testicular cancer.
Clinical Presentation
Most patients present with:
- Painless,
palpable testicular mass
- Slowly enlarging lesion
- Occasionally discovered
incidentally during scrotal ultrasound
Notably:
- No systemic symptoms
- No hormonal abnormalities
- No metastatic signs
Pain or tenderness is uncommon and suggests alternative diagnoses such as
torsion or infection.
Imaging Features
Figure 1. Scrotal Ultrasound – “Onion Skin” Appearance; High-resolution scrotal ultrasound demonstrates a well-defined, intratesticular, avascular mass with characteristic concentric hyperechoic and hypoechoic rings, known as the “onion skin” or “target” sign, highly suggestive of a testicular epidermoid cyst.
Key imaging features:
- Well-circumscribed lesion
- Hypoechoic or mixed
echogenicity
- Lamellated internal
echoes
- No internal
vascularity on color Doppler
Figure 2. MRI T2-weighted Imaging; T2-weighted MRI shows a sharply demarcated intratesticular lesion with concentric alternating signal intensity rings, corresponding to layered keratin content.
Key MRI findings:
- T1: Variable signal
intensity
- T2: Onion-ring appearance
- DWI: Restricted diffusion
due to keratin
- Post-contrast: No enhancement
Figure 3. Contrast-Enhanced MRI; Contrast-enhanced MRI confirms absence of internal enhancement, effectively excluding malignant germ cell tumors.
Differential Diagnosis
Differential diagnosis of testicular epidermoid cyst includes:
- Seminoma
- Homogeneous hypoechoic
mass
- Increased vascularity
- Elevated tumor markers
(occasionally)
- Non-seminomatous
germ cell tumor
- Heterogeneous
echotexture
- Necrosis or hemorrhage
- Elevated AFP or β-hCG
- Testicular
abscess
- Clinical signs of
infection
- Peripheral hyperemia
- Burned-out
tumor
- Fibrotic scar
- Microlithiasis
- Intratesticular
hematoma
- Trauma history
- Evolution over time
The onion-skin appearance with avascularity is highly specific for
testicular epidermoid cyst.
Diagnosis
The diagnosis is based on a combination of:
- Typical imaging findings
- Normal serum tumor
markers
- Lack of vascularity
- Clinical stability
Definitive diagnosis may be achieved
via:
- Testis-sparing surgery
with frozen section
- Histopathologic
confirmation
Treatment
Standard Management Options
- Testis-sparing
surgery (preferred)
- Indicated when imaging
features are classic
- Preserves fertility and
endocrine function
- Radical
orchiectomy
- Reserved for
indeterminate imaging
- Still commonly performed
due to diagnostic uncertainty
Current guidelines increasingly favor organ-preserving approaches.
Prognosis
- Excellent
prognosis
- No malignant
transformation reported
- No recurrence after
complete excision
- No metastatic potential
Long-term follow-up is generally not required once diagnosis is confirmed.
Quiz
Question 1
A 28-year-old man presents with a painless testicular mass. Ultrasound
shows a well-defined avascular lesion with concentric echogenic rings. Tumor
markers are normal. What is the most likely diagnosis?
A. Seminoma
B. Testicular abscess
C. Testicular epidermoid cyst
D. Leydig cell tumor
Answer & Explanation
Answer: C
Explanation:
The onion-skin appearance with absent vascularity and normal tumor markers is
classic for testicular epidermoid cyst.
Question 2
Which imaging feature most reliably differentiates testicular epidermoid
cyst from malignant tumors?
A. Size
B. Patient age
C. Lack of enhancement on MRI
D. Testicular pain
Answer & Explanation
Answer: C
Explanation:
Absence of enhancement confirms lack of vascularity, excluding malignancy.
Question 3
What is the preferred management when classic imaging features of
testicular epidermoid cyst are present?
A. Chemotherapy
B. Radiotherapy
C. Radical orchiectomy
D. Testis-sparing surgery
Answer & Explanation
Answer: D
Explanation:
Testis-sparing surgery preserves fertility and is appropriate for benign
lesions.
References
- Dogra VS et al.,
“Sonographic features of testicular epidermoid cysts,” Radiology,
vol. 210, no. 1, pp. 159–164, 1999.
- Woodward PJ et al., “From
the archives of the AFIP: tumors and tumorlike lesions of the testis,” Radiographics,
vol. 22, pp. 189–216, 2002.
- Cassidy FH et al., “MR
imaging of scrotal tumors,” Radiographics, vol. 30, pp. 665–683,
2010.
- Tsili AC et al., “MRI of
the scrotum,” AJR, vol. 204, pp. 552–563, 2015.
- Langer JE et al.,
“Imaging of testicular tumors,” Ultrasound Quarterly, vol. 35, pp.
223–234, 2019.
- Laguna MP et al.,
“Testis-sparing surgery,” European Urology, vol. 68, pp. 1045–1052,
2015.
- WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs, 5th ed., IARC, 2022.
Comments
Post a Comment