Portal Vein Aneurysm: Comprehensive Overview
A portal vein aneurysm
(PVA) is a rare vascular abnormality defined as a focal dilatation of the
portal venous system, typically involving the main portal vein but also
potentially occurring in the intrahepatic or extrahepatic branches. Although
often asymptomatic and discovered incidentally, it can occasionally lead to
serious complications.
1. Cause and Etiology
Portal vein aneurysms are
classified as congenital or acquired, depending on their origin.
Congenital PVAs
- Believed to result from developmental weakness in
the vessel wall due to incomplete regression of embryonic vitelline
veins or failure of normal vascular remodeling.
- May be associated with connective tissue
disorders such as Ehlers-Danlos syndrome or other vascular
malformations.
Acquired PVAs
These typically occur due to:
- Portal hypertension (the most common acquired
cause) usually results from liver cirrhosis.
- Trauma or surgery involving the portal
venous system (iatrogenic).
- Pancreatitis or cholangitis with associated
inflammation or thrombosis leading to vessel wall weakening.
- Neoplasms causing extrinsic
compression or direct invasion of the portal vein.
- Infections (e.g., hepatitis,
pyogenic liver abscess) damage the vessel wall.
2. Pathophysiology
The exact pathophysiological
mechanism depends on the etiology:
- Congenital PVAs: Weakness in the venous
wall due to defective collagen or elastic tissue leads to progressive
dilatation under normal portal venous pressure.
- Acquired PVAs:
- Increased intraluminal pressure (as in portal
hypertension) results in venous dilatation.
- Chronic inflammation or thrombosis can lead to focal wall
damage, resulting in aneurysmal outpouching.
- Over time, aneurysms may become predisposed to complications
like thrombosis, rupture, or compression of adjacent
structures.
A true aneurysm involves all
layers of the vessel wall, while a pseudoaneurysm is a contained rupture
without an intact wall, typically due to trauma or surgery.
3. Epidemiology
- Extremely rare, with fewer than 200
cases reported in the literature.
- Prevalence: Unknown due to rarity
and incidental nature; some studies suggest the prevalence of <0.5% in
imaging series.
- Age: Can occur at any age, but is most frequently detected
in middle-aged and older adults.
- Gender: No clear gender predilection, although some
reports show a slight male predominance.
- Increasing detection due to widespread use of
cross-sectional imaging (e.g., CT, MRI, Doppler ultrasound).
4. Clinical Presentation
- Asymptomatic in most cases and
discovered incidentally on imaging.
- When symptomatic, patients may present with:
- Right upper quadrant or epigastric pain
- Nausea and vomiting
- Symptoms of portal hypertension (if aneurysm compresses
adjacent structures or is associated with liver disease)
- Palpable abdominal mass (rare)
- Gastrointestinal bleeding, if an aneurysm ruptures
or causes varices
- Portal vein thrombosis symptoms are if complicated
by clot formation
5. Imaging Features
Accurate diagnosis relies
heavily on imaging. Common modalities include:
Ultrasound (US) with Doppler:
- First-line modality due to
accessibility and non-invasiveness.
- Shows a well-defined, anechoic, cystic mass
in the region of the portal vein with internal blood flow on color
Doppler.
- “Yin-yang” sign may be seen on Doppler
due to turbulent flow.
Computed Tomography (CT):
- Demonstrates a focal, contrast-enhancing
dilatation of the portal vein.
- Provides excellent anatomical detail, helping
differentiate from cysts or solid tumors.
- Can detect associated thrombosis or compression
of nearby structures.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
(MRI) / MR Angiography (MRA):
- Helpful in characterizing flow dynamics and soft
tissue contrast.
- Visualizes thrombus and aneurysm wall more clearly
than CT.
Criteria for Diagnosis:
- Diameter > 15 mm in the main portal vein
(some use >19 mm for extrahepatic and >7 mm for intrahepatic veins).
- Fusiform or saccular dilatation.
6. Treatment
Treatment depends on the size,
symptoms, and complications.
Conservative Management:
- Asymptomatic and stable PVAs are usually managed with
observation and periodic imaging.
- Anticoagulation may be considered if thrombosis is
present or if the patient is at high risk.
Surgical or Interventional
Treatment:
Indicated for:
- Symptomatic aneurysms
- Rapidly enlarging aneurysms
- Thrombosed aneurysms
- Compression of adjacent structures
- Rupture (very rare)
Options include:
- Aneurysmectomy: Surgical removal.
- Porto-systemic shunt: In cases with portal
hypertension.
- Endovascular approaches: Rare, but may include
stenting or embolization.
- Liver transplantation: In cases of severe
liver disease with complex portal venous anatomy.
7. Prognosis
- Generally good in asymptomatic, stable cases
with no complications.
- Excellent prognosis with conservative
management in most congenital or incidentally discovered aneurysms.
- Prognosis worsens with complications like:
- Thrombosis → portal hypertension,
mesenteric ischemia.
- Rupture → rare but potentially
fatal.
- Compression of the bile ducts or
duodenum.
Long-term monitoring is recommended to assess
aneurysm size and complications.
Summary Table
Feature |
Portal Vein Aneurysm |
Etiology |
Congenital (developmental
defect), Acquired (cirrhosis, trauma, inflammation) |
Pathophysiology |
Focal dilatation due to wall
weakness or increased portal pressure |
Epidemiology |
Rare; more common with
increased imaging utilization |
Clinical Presentation |
Often asymptomatic; possible
pain, mass, thrombosis, or GI bleeding |
Imaging |
US (anechoic cystic mass
with flow), CT/MRI (enhancing dilatation of the portal vein) |
Treatment |
Observation if asymptomatic;
surgery/intervention if symptomatic or complicated |
Prognosis |
Excellent if managed
appropriately; complications can affect the outcome |
=============================
Case study: Postprandial Pain in a 58-Year-Old Woman
History and Imaging
-
A 58-year-old woman with a medical history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia.
-
She previously underwent stent placement for bilateral cavernous internal carotid artery aneurysms.
-
She presented with recurrent periumbilical and right-sided abdominal pain that began two days ago, occurring primarily after meals.
-
Imaging studies were performed.
Quiz:
What is the most likely diagnosis?
(1) Pancreatic head cystic lesion (mucinous cystadenoma)
(2) Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)
(3) Vascular lesion (e.g., aneurysm)
(4) Choledochal cyst
Findings and Diagnosis:
Findings:
Differential Diagnosis
-
Portal vein aneurysm (PVA)
-
Hypervascular pancreatic head lesion (e.g., neuroendocrine tumor or metastasis)
-
Mycotic portal vein aneurysm
Diagnosis
Portal vein aneurysm (sporadic/incidental; not mycotic)
Treatment
The patient was managed conservatively with symptomatic relief and regular surveillance of the aneurysm.
Discussion
Portal Vein Aneurysm (PVA)
The most common location for visceral venous aneurysms is within the portal venous system. Among PVAs, the main portal vein and the confluence of the splenic and superior mesenteric veins are the most frequently reported sites. A portal vein diameter exceeding 20 mm is generally accepted as diagnostic for extrahepatic PVA.
The exact etiology and pathogenesis of PVA remain unclear. However, portal hypertension and chronic liver disease are considered known risk factors. Other possible associations include pancreatitis, abdominal trauma, and a history of abdominal surgery.
The clinical presentation of PVA depends on factors such as aneurysm size, presence of complications (e.g., thrombosis, rupture), or comorbid conditions such as cirrhosis or portal hypertension. Small PVAs are frequently asymptomatic. When symptomatic, patients may present with recurrent epigastric or upper abdominal pain, jaundice, or, in rare cases, gastrointestinal bleeding.
Ultrasound is considered an accurate and reliable screening tool for PVA, as it typically appears as an anechoic mass with monophasic, non-pulsatile flow on color Doppler imaging. When the diagnosis is unclear, contrast-enhanced CT or MRI can be useful to differentiate between thrombosed and patent aneurysms.
In general, the presence of symptoms or thrombosis does not automatically indicate surgical intervention. Even large aneurysms or those extending into the splenic and superior mesenteric veins are primarily managed with conservative treatment and close follow-up, which remains the standard of care.
Learning Points
-
Recognition of PVA and its predisposing factors
-
Diagnostic, monitoring, and surveillance imaging strategies
-
A multidisciplinary and individualized approach is essential for the optimal management of each PVA case.
Reference
(1) Koc,
Z., Oguzkurt, L., & Ulusan, S. (2007). "Portal vein aneurysms:
Imaging, clinical findings, and a possible new etiologic factor." American
Journal of Roentgenology, 189(5), 1023–1027. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2266
(2) Lillemoe,
K. D., Yeo, C. J., Talamini, M. A., et al. (1990). "Portal vein aneurysm:
An unusual cause of portal hypertension."
Surgery, 108(5), 880–886.PMID: 2233790
(3) Laurenzi,
A., Ettorre, G. M., Lionetti, R., et al. (2005). "Portal vein aneurysm:
What to know." Digestive and Liver Disease, 37(10), 724–728. DOI:
10.1016/j.dld.2005.03.014
(4) Agarwal,
A. K., Sharma, D., & Agarwal, S. (2015). "Portal vein aneurysm: A rare
entity." Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 9(3), TD03–TD04. DOI:
10.7860/JCDR/2015/11371.5666
(5) Ghuman,
S. S., Kaur, T., & Singh, K. (2019). "Portal vein aneurysm: A
review." Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology, 9(3),
373–377. DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2018.06.005
Comments
Post a Comment